Jump to content
Fly Tying
Al Beatty

Legal Question - Fly Tying

Recommended Posts

Hi group,

 

I'm looking for thoughts from any of you in the legal profession. We recently submitted a manuscript on rotary fly tying to a publisher. Today, we learned one of the rotary vise manufacturers IS or IS PLANNING to copywrite the words "true rotary." This particular company has sued over other "infringements" on this ideas. I've been using that term for more than 15 years and it is scattered throughout the upcoming book. Do I need to retrieve the book from the editor and do a quick re-write to remove said words? It wouldn't take much to do so - probably more time spent mailing the manuscript back and forth than the actual re-write. Any of you lawyers have any ideas? Thanks in advance for any comments. Sorry if this is the wrong part of the forum for this question (Will, please remove/move if it is). Take care & ...

 

Tight Lines - Al Beatty

www.btsflyfishing.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Al:

While not a legal type, I would notify the publisher ASAP, explain the situation to them

and let their legal eagles decide.

 

Have fun,

 

George

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Check with the copyrights and see if it is in "legal use" if it is not proceed with the book. I dont think there is any legal action they can take.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

QUOTE
IS PLANNING

 

Sounds to me like it really doesn't matter since they haven't done anything with it yet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would call the manuscript back and change it.

Some time from now when people read it, they could get the idea that it is a commercial they just purchased.

Or maybe they think that this speciffic True rotary vice is the only thing worth buying. You made made a great recomendation of it and didn't get a penny for it?

 

Good luck with the manus,

Jakob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know the company to which you refer. I've heard about this for a few years, now. I don't think they can sue Mazda for have a "True Rotary" engine, so....Anyway, I think that as long as you are referring to recommending a "True Rotary" vise as the best option to tie with that it would only help them, not hurt them. It might be an idea to contact them directly, and tell them what you are planning to do. You might be given written permission to go forward with what you are planning without any trouble. If not, then you are that much farther ahead at knowing that they intend to try to stop you. Better to find out before hand if they do plan to take leagal action.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

Since your book looks like it will predate any thing they do, and if you have other writings using the the term "true rotary" previous to the upcoming publication, the truth is they don't have ANY legal leg to stand on. Trying to copyright a term already in common usage is not supposed to be allowed. This c*** is one reason I'll never own a R*******. They are just ridiculous. The problem is that they could tie you up in court...they'll lose but it might cost a lot in the long run before they end up having to pay for your court costs.

 

Mark Delaney

 

P.S. I used to work in the area of Ziegleer-Natta catalysts...you want to get confuesed try reading a few of those patents....they all look the same. MSD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Al, I just did a search, looks like Renzetti has a copyright to the term "true rotary"

 

US patent and trademark search

 

www.uspto.gov is the site to search for Trademarks and Copyrights. I own the rights to the words "Go Solar". But you can look into more specifics regarding the copyright. For example my copyright is a commonly used slogan within the industry I work in, but if anyone tries to start a "mail order" business with my copyright I have legal recourse.

 

Graham

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

I would actually talk to a Lawyer about it (unless there is a copyright lawyer on the board). I'd actually deal with one who knows the ins and outs of it. I know there are alot of things that are allowed. Especially if you had your books in the works before they did the trademark. They could be infringing on YOUR rights. I do believe to take ownership, they must not infringe on someone elses works before hand. I remember a case where something like this happened. I'm no lawyer, so I would say talk to one who specializes in it. I think that with the book being in the works for quite awhile, I doubt "the company" would have a leg to stand on. I believe their trademark only holds water if someone "touts" their vise as "True Rotary". You talking about a "true rotary" would not be the same. Personally, the company that's involved, I myself would pull and edit JUST so they won't get any extra publicity from it.

 

Chem, I'm with you 100%. I won't buy their products either, nor will I endorse them in anyway. I've had dealings with them, and won't ever buy another product of theirs. After some of the stuff "that company" did with other "infringements", I don't want anything to do with them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with SH69, but getting lawyers involves gets expensive, especially their time searching for prior usage. The patent office spends about a year or two searching for terms before granting a Federal copyright. It took 18 months for mine to be approved. Typically it is when a copyrighted term is used in commerce, (to make a buck), that infringement becomes an issue. I would probably change the term to either; accurate revolving or true gyratory and forget the lawyers.

Graham

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Word Mark TRUE ROTARY

Goods and Services IC 008. US 023 028 044. G & S: fly tying vises. FIRST USE: 19900000. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 19900000

Mark Drawing Code (1) TYPED DRAWING

Serial Number 75519221

Filing Date July 15, 1998

Current Filing Basis 1A

Original Filing Basis 1A

Published for Opposition January 1, 2002

Registration Number 2551441

Registration Date March 26, 2002

Owner (REGISTRANT) RENZETTI, INC. CORPORATION PENNSYLVANIA 6080 Grissom Parkway Titusville FLORIDA 32780

Attorney of Record EUGENE E RENZ JR

Type of Mark TRADEMARK

Register PRINCIPAL-2(F)

Live/Dead Indicator LIVE

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

I deal with copyright issues quite a bit in my job and the easiest thing for you to do is ask permission from Renzetti. Expain to them that the book does noe endorse any particular vise and that the book might even generate sales for them. Tell them you will acknowledge their cooperation in the book. I don't see them making a big deal out of it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't know you can copyright words - this is great news.

 

I'm rushing out to copyright "We need to talk" "Does this make me look fat" "You go fishing all the time" and "Not tonight I have a headache" and then whenever my wife utters said phrases I'll sue her for copyright infringement and send her to jail for a month.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...