Welcome to FlyTyingForum.com

FlyTyingForum.com is the largest fly tying community in the world and we hope you take a moment to register for a free account and join this amazingly friendly and helpful group of anglers. FTF has over 12,000 registered members that have made over 300,000 posts and have uploaded over 6,000 patterns to our exclusive fly pattern database!
If you are an experienced fly tier or just starting out FTF is the perfect place to call home. Click Here To Register for a Free Account
![]() |
| ||
| Fly Pattern Database / Browse by Topics / Browse by Material / Fly Tying Bench Database / Fly Fishing & Tying Videos / FTFCurrent(NEW!) |
| Featured Products: Fly Tying Hooks / Fly Tying Scissors / Waterproof Fly Boxes |
Overharvesting dragonfly nymphs...
#1
Posted 17 April 2010 - 10:48 PM
in Oregon around the Todd Lake area that took place in the
past years.
It's an interesting little read that shows how quickly people can
damage a simple niche of a lake ecosystem.
In this case, how quickly actual dragonfly numbers in a lake area can be depleted
over such a short period of time by over harvesting.
Dragon nymphs were being sold by the thousands for 12-18$ per dozen or so
being collected from lakes there. Shame.
Dragonfly report
#2
Posted 18 April 2010 - 07:00 AM
IMO habitat destruction was probably the culprit. "Rolling over logs" etc plus wading all through the best areas, probably those area with weed growth and an organic matter bottom. Damn those professional guides!!! And fishermen in general!!!
"the uniqueness of the Todd Lake populations may be lost" blah blah blah that is SOOO typical and also so unprovable, of a university researcher working on a master's or doctorate... I'd like to see what has happened in the past 10 years. Good God if this guy would have somehow tied in Global Warming into his reasoning for population changes, he'd have been rolling in Taxpayer dollars from government research grants.
I wonder what the natural population cycle is like for that area too. Every living thing goes through peaks and troughs of population density in a given area. Some are extremely noticeable, like the 11 year cycle of Ruffed Grouse in the northeast, others are poorly understood.
Fly Fishermen: Making simple things complicated since the beginning of time!
#3
Posted 18 April 2010 - 07:18 AM
IMO habitat destruction was probably the culprit. "Rolling over logs" etc plus wading all through the best areas, probably those area with weed growth and an organic matter bottom. Damn those professional guides!!! And fishermen in general!!!
"the uniqueness of the Todd Lake populations may be lost" blah blah blah that is SOOO typical and also so unprovable, of a university researcher working on a master's or doctorate... I'd like to see what has happened in the past 10 years. Good God if this guy would have somehow tied in Global Warming into his reasoning for population changes, he'd have been rolling in Taxpayer dollars from government research grants.
I wonder what the natural population cycle is like for that area too. Every living thing goes through peaks and troughs of population density in a given area. Some are extremely noticeable, like the 11 year cycle of Ruffed Grouse in the northeast, others are poorly understood.
I'm questioning it in the same way. I'll allow for the possibility that it may be true, but a single, ten year old study doesn't convince me, and certainly didn't show a causal effect. It could be cyclical, it could be climate related (too hot/cold/dry/wet), there may have been nearby logging, any number of causes.
OTOH, I don't have any problem with the study being done, and if there were good solid evidence (and this isn't it) that overharvesting is is having a major negative impact on the population, then regulation may be in order.
#4
Posted 21 April 2010 - 11:19 AM
"Always drink upstream from the herd."
#5
Posted 29 April 2010 - 02:28 PM
#6
Posted 27 May 2010 - 12:20 PM













